Lewandowski took a combative tone from the start, slamming committee Democrats, criticizing Obama-era intelligence officials, praising Trump’s successful 2016 campaign and jabbing at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. He denied any collusion with Russia — even though the Mueller report doesn’t accuse him of that — but avoided commenting on the obstruction issue.
The White House on Monday had sent a letter to the committee saying that it was directing Lewandowski not to answer questions about his conversations with the President, beyond what was in the Mueller report.
Lewandowski demanded a copy of the Mueller report as House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a New York Democrat, began asking questions about his meetings with Trump. Lewandowski has refused to answer several questions regarding his discussions with Trump.
Nadler accused the White House of being engaged in an “absolute cover-up” by blocking witnesses from appearing and trying to restrict Lewandowski’s testimony based on “crony privilege.”
Mueller investigated 10 episodes involving Trump for potential obstruction of justice, and the Lewandowski situation was one of those episodes. In the report, prosecutors analyzed whether each incident checked the three boxes needed to typically bring an obstruction charge.
Lewandowski in the Mueller report
A month after making the request to Lewandowski about Sessions, the President followed up with Lewandowski and told him that if Sessions did not meet with him, he would be fired. Lewandowski did not deliver the intended message to Sessions. Instead, he asked former White House aide Rick Dearborn to speak to Sessions, believing he would be a better messenger, the special counsel wrote. Dearborn later told Lewandowski he had handled the situation, but he did not actually follow through.
The committee has objected to this rationale previously, and is currently suing to force former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify after the White House made a similar claim when he was subpoenaed earlier this year.
Lewandowski did not serve in the Trump administration, so he does not have the same immunity. But the White House is claiming the right to assert executive privilege over his conversations with the President in instructing him not to answer those questions. House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler disputed that the White House can make this claim without invoking privilege.
When Lewandowski appeared behind closed doors before the House Intelligence Committee last year, he did not answer the committee’s questions about topics after he left the campaign in 2016, in a session that led to expletives being shouted across the room.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
CNN’s Manu Raju and Pamela Brown contributed to this report.