One of the anti-Trump “witnesses” brought forward by House Democrats launched into a weird tangent about President Trump’s 13-year-old son Barron to make a point about tyrannical kings…or something.
While testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, Stanford law professor and lawyer Pamela Karlan began ranting about Barron and the Constitution to somehow argue that Trump wishes he could be a king.
“Kings could do no wrong because the king’s word was law,” Karlan, a generous Hillary Clinton donor, said. “And contrary to what President Trump has said, Article II does not give him the power to do anything he wants.”
KARLAN: “I will give you one example that shows you the difference between him and a king, which is, the Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. So while Trump can name his son ‘Barron,’ he can’t make him a baron.” pic.twitter.com/FF0E0KyAEh
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) December 4, 2019
“I’ll just give you one example that shows you the difference between him and a king,” she continued, “which is, the Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. So while the president can name his son ‘Barron,’ he can’t make him a Baron.”
Trump named his son “Barron” — it’s time to IMPEACH!
Democrat operatives bringing up the president’s youngest son to try to prove he committed an impeachable offense just highlights the fact they have absolutely no evidence of a crime.
It also further illustrates how low the left will go to smear, besmirch, or denigrate Trump by any means.
How vile of a person do you have to be to attack a 13 year old child on national TV for laughs?
Apparently, vile enough to be the supposed star witness for Democrats.
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) December 4, 2019
Twitter: Follow @WhiteIsTheFury
Alex Jones brings video proof of the danger posed to America by the rotting diseased brains of the left.
Get DNA Force 50% off and get a free bottle of Brain Force Plus now!
Cornelius Rupert T.
Cornelius Rupert T.